EXECUTIVE BRIEF
The CMMC 2.0 program is composed of two main regulations: 32 CFR and 48 CFR. While the 32 CFR rule, which is establishes the program requirements and marketplace, is effective, the DIB is waiting for the final 48 CFR rule to be published. Here's why it is important:
Dig deeper and continue reading below!
Department of Defense (DoD) subcontractors work in an industry that grows more complex by the day. With the pending release of the final rule for 48 CFR, a new chapter begins in the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) compliance process, impacting acquisition planning, contracting methods, and federal procurement practices.
Below, we explore the 48 CFR rule, its connection to the CMMC framework, and how it impacts your procurement and compliance processes. Learn exactly what steps to take to ensure your business stays competitive and secure in the evolving defense landscape.
Short for “Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations,” 48 CFR is part of the Federal Acquisition Regulation System (FAR), which covers federal procurement and contracting officer rules. If you’ve worked on government contracts, you’ve likely interacted with FAR and its accompanying agency supplements (like the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement or DFARS).
48 CFR specifically outlines acquisition standards for defense-related activities. The 48 CFR final rule integrates CMMC 2.0 requirements into the FAR framework, laying the foundation for how contractors prove their adherence to cybersecurity controls, such as NIST 800-171. Once fully implemented, subcontractors must demonstrate compliance at specified CMMC levels to bid on or retain contracts related to national defense.
48 CFR comprises various parts and subchapters, including Subchapter A (general policies) and Subchapter B (acquisition planning), which inform contracting activities across underserved areas. These provisions directly affect contractors, particularly in handling commercial items, managing cancellations, and engaging the federal government at multiple administrative levels. The Board of Contract Appeals also plays a role here, adjudicating disputes and ensuring accountability when conflicts arise over procurement terms or non-compliance.
While Title 48 CFR outlines regulatory guidance, it functions alongside the United States Code (U.S.C.), which provides the legislative mandate on procurement programs. Together, these systems govern defense contracting, shaping everything from solicitation provisions to acquisition planning.
Failure to align your operations with 48 CFR rules may affect your ability to compete for government contracts, including those awarded by federal agencies such as the Department of Energy, Department of State, and Department of Transportation.
CMMC compliance is divided into two regulatory components:
While 32 CFR establishes CMMC as a policy, 48 CFR integrates these requirements into the FAR system, giving them real-world applications for defense contractors.
Once the phased rollout begins in 2025, all solicitations tied to DoD contracts will require CMMC 2.0 certification, starting with CMMC Level 1 and working up to Level 2 for subcontractors handling sensitive data.
This rule isn’t limited to national defense—other federal agencies, including the General Services Administration and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), may also adopt its provisions over time.
The latest 48 CFR Final Rule updates significantly reshape how DoD subcontractors approach cybersecurity compliance. Understanding these changes is essential for businesses in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) to maintain contract eligibility and avoid costly setbacks.
Recent revisions to 48 CFR clarify expectations for subcontractors, such as:
Here is a hypothetical example of a contractor navigating the CFR 48 final rule.
A veteran-owned SMB specializing in defense software development is struggling to meet the demanding timelines set by the 48 CFR phased rollout. With limited internal resources, the company faces challenges documenting its cybersecurity practices and preparing for a CMMC Level 2 assessment.
ISI steps in to conduct a detailed readiness assessment and guide the company through creating its System Security Plan (SSP) and Plan of Action and Milestones (POAM). With ISI’s CMMC compliance guidance and managed IT services, the SMB implements the necessary controls and completes its certification process in six months.
Organizations preparing to comply with CMMC 2.0 requirements must take proactive steps to ensure readiness and alignment with federal standards. This includes developing comprehensive SSPs to document their cybersecurity posture and identify areas for improvement; assessing how updates to federal regulations might impact subcontractor flow-down obligations and ensuring all parties in the supply chain adhere to the necessary standards; and integrating robust cybersecurity practices into acquisition planning and daily operations to minimize risks and stay ahead of compliance deadlines.
For small and medium-sized businesses, the timeline to meet 48 CFR requirements is short, and the stakes are high:
By taking these measures now, organizations can build a resilient framework to seamlessly meet current and future CMMC requirements.
Pro Tip: Treat compliance as an ongoing process, not a checkbox. Regularly update your systems to adapt to new requirements.
48 CFR is an essential legal resource that outlines the rules and guidelines required for compliance. The eCFR (Electronic Code of Federal Regulations) database offers a user-friendly, searchable platform that provides real-time access to updated clauses and amendments. By utilizing this tool, organizations can efficiently stay informed of any regulatory changes or requirements relevant to their operations, ensuring that no crucial details are overlooked.
Compliance advisory partners, such as Registered Provider Organizations (RPOs) like ISI Enterprises, play a critical role in guiding organizations through the complexities of CMMC. These experts deliver tailored insights and solutions designed to address specific operational challenges. Their services often include pre-assessment audits, gap analyses, and actionable strategies to help you align seamlessly with government standards.
BUTTON: Contact ISI for Expert Guidance on Compliance Strategies
Comprehensive training programs offer invaluable support, equipping your team with the knowledge to manage compliance obligations effectively. Participating in workshops, webinars, or on-demand courses hosted by seasoned professionals provides a practical understanding of the CMMC framework and its application to your organization. These resources enhance your team's competency and minimize risks associated with non-compliance.
For organizations requiring additional hands-on assistance, one-on-one consulting services are available to address unique challenges and develop specialized compliance strategies. These can include documentation reviews, implementation roadmaps, and ongoing advisory support, ensuring precision in every step of the compliance process.
Complying with the CMMC framework and updates to 48 CFR isn’t just about securing contracts—it’s about playing a critical role in national security while safeguarding your business from regulatory pitfalls. The sooner you adapt to these expectations, the stronger your position in a competitive market.
Need help getting started? ISI provides expert consulting, compliance management, and educational resources to defense contractors across the U.S. Schedule a consultation today to solidify your compliance strategy.
Contact ISI for Expert Guidance on Compliance Strategies
Collaboration among key agencies, including the Department of Commerce, the Department of Justice, the Department of Labor, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, supports the implementation of 48 CFR and CMMC compliance. Contractors handling CUI should expect layered obligations from these entities and oversight from the Defense Acquisition Regulations System (DARS). Similarly, federal contracts requiring cybersecurity readiness may engage agencies such as Health and Human Services and the Department of Veterans Affairs, underscoring the cross-sector impact of these rules.
Executive orders, such as EO 13556 (on CUI), have historically influenced cybersecurity regulations but are not direct drivers of CMMC compliance. Subcontractors should stay informed about how new directives from the White House may affect cybersecurity requirements under programs administered by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). Such awareness solidifies alignment with broader procurement regulations while maintaining competitiveness in the government sector.