EXECUTIVE BRIEF
To meet Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) compliance and protect your standing in the defense supply chain, contractors must take logging and continuous monitoring seriously. CMMC is a Department of Defense (DoD) framework designed to ensure that contractors and subcontractors implement appropriate cybersecurity practices to protect sensitive government information like Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).
According to the 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report by Ponemon Institute and IBM Security, organizations that leverage AI and automation—which includes tools like SIEM systems that are built on log data and continuous monitoring—to security prevention saw the biggest impact in reducing the cost of a breach, saving an average of USD $2.2 million over those organizations without such practices.
Logging, in the context of CMMC, refers to capturing and analyzing data about user actions, system events, and security-related incidents across your network. These logs serve as a forensic trail to detect unauthorized access and other anomalies.
Under CMMC 2.0, logging requirements vary by level:
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) defines continuous monitoring as maintaining ongoing awareness of information security, vulnerabilities, and threats. For CMMC, this translates into real-time visibility and rapid response to ensure a compliant security posture. Event and incident logging are key to a robust continuous monitoring system, serving as the foundation for identifying anomalies and proving due diligence—both of which are imperative to achieving and maintaining CMMC certification.
Several CMMC controls directly relate to logging and monitoring:
These requirements align with NIST SP 800-171, the backbone of CMMC Level 2, reinforcing the need to document and act on security events effectively.
While often used interchangeably, logging and monitoring serve distinct but complementary functions in CMMC compliance:
In short, logging captures the evidence, while monitoring interprets it. Both are essential under CMMC Level 2 to detect, respond to, and document security incidents effectively.
Modern security tools simplify logging and monitoring:
Automation plays a key role in filtering noise and prioritizing alerts. While CMMC doesn’t mandate SIEM, it is highly recommended to manage complex log data efficiently and meet Level 2 audit expectations.
Even with strong tools, contractors face several challenges:
Failure to address these issues can lead to non-compliance, loss of contract eligibility, or even reputational damage.
Here’s how contractors can build a sustainable logging strategy:
ISI Insight: Continuous monitoring transforms compliance from a checklist into a proactive defense strategy. When threats emerge, logged data provides context for faster decision-making.
Continuous monitoring is the real-time evaluation of security controls and system health. Within CMMC, it’s crucial for:
By implementing continuous monitoring, contractors ensure their cybersecurity defenses remain dynamic—not reactive.
Beyond compliance, logging and continuous monitoring are central to a resilient cybersecurity strategy. They:
These capabilities build trust and strengthen your standing in the supply chain when implemented correctly.
For DoD subcontractors, meeting CMMC requirements isn't just a regulatory box to check—it's a critical measure to safeguard FCI and CUI from cyber threats.
Effective logging and continuous monitoring are not just CMMC requirements –they're business enablers. They protect sensitive data, streamline response efforts, and show prime contractors you’re a reliable partner.
Contact ISI today for a tailored CMMC compliance strategy and move closer to your certification goals.
Automation plays a critical role in managing CMMC logging requirements by helping contractors prioritize alerts, reduce manual review, and maintain detailed log records for audits. It ensures that threats are flagged and addressed promptly to maintain compliance and security posture.
Because they're required for most Level 2 contractors. Third-party assessments ensure that your logging and monitoring practices meet the expectations of NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC. Less than 5% of contractors will certify via self-assessment due to the sensitivity of the CUI they manage.
The financial risks of non-compliance can be severe—ranging from lost contracts to potential False Claims Act penalties. Inadequate logging can undermine incident response and audit readiness, which may lead to disqualification from DoD opportunities.
While there’s no fixed number, non-compliance can result in ineligibility for defense contracts and potential False Claims Act penalties that reach into the 7- or 8-figure range.